I’m not a fan of the current norms for a working life. There just seems to be something so wrong about spending the best part of a day slaving away behind a desk, working towards goals that you likely have no control over. The current 9 to 5 work day has its origins back in the industrial revolution and in the almost 200 years since then we’ve seemingly been unable to get past the idea that we should all spend 40+ hours a week at our place of work. Ultimately I believe that such norms represent an archaic idea about how efficient a workforce can be, especially considering that 200 years ago ides like telecommuting were in the realms of science fiction.
I feel the same way about the 2 day weekend that we’re all accustomed to. It’s not that I feel like I deserve the extra break, although it is quite welcome, more the fact that after experimenting with a 3 day weekend for the better part of a year I found myself to be wholly more productive at work and during my time off. Sure it could be tough sometimes making up the required 40 hours during the week but that extra day off ensured that I came back ready to face the challenges ahead of me, usually with a vigor unmatched by other employees.
It’s not just all anecdotal blustering on my part either. Research shows that people with flexible working arrangements, the ones that would allow for things like a permanent 3 day weekend, are more productive and much more satisfied with their jobs.It’s not surprise really as they are able to fit work around their life rather than the other way around. For many people this may be the odd day off here and there, but many will choose to take that as either a Friday or Monday in order to maximise the benefit of having said day off.
For someone like me the extra day off was usually spent doing all the menial things that would otherwise eat up half of my weekend. Whilst 2 days is a good amount of time for leisure it is usually interrupted by chores, commitments and sometimes even catching up on work that “needs” to be done. The additional day would then serve as a buffer for such things, ensuring that you’d be able to spend the next 2 days fully indulging in whatever leisure activities you seek. The effect was quite liberating and the three day weekend was the first reason why I started pursuing the idea behind Lobaco as up until then I simply struggled to find the time to work on such ideas.
I’m not the only one to think this either. Whilst I’m sure everyone would appreciate having another day off it seems that more and more people are recognising that the current norms for working aren’t suited to the world we live in, especially considering the technological advances of the past couple decades. There’s also been significant movement towards more flexible working arrangements, however they still constitute a minority in the wider world. It’s still progress however and someday I believe that the idea of working a 5 day, 9 to 5 job will be an archaic relic of our past.
For someone like me the benefits seem obvious. I’ve been there and seen them for myself and there’s a growing movement of people who’ve done the same. It’s not a hard change to make either, realistically workplaces have no reason not to try it especially if they track their employees with any kind of performance metrics. It is a fight against giant inertia however, the 200 year old habits of the working world are going to die a slow death even with the hand of technology pushing it towards its demise. I hope one day to rejoin the ranks of those who enjoy a shortened work week and lengthened weekend, but until then I will continue to spruik its benefits to all, hoping to fall on sympathetic ears.
I’m going to go one step further and say that 20 hours of work is enough to be productive at least for knowledge workers. I think if you ask someone to come in for 4 hours a day (or work for four hours a day wherever they are), they will be more up to the task than if you ask them to spend 8 hours a day in a cube farm.
I’m a big believer in Parkinson’s Law:
“Work expands so as to fill the time available for its completion.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinson's_Law
In that respect I’d totally agree with you. I think we’d be surprised by how productive people could be if the required work hours were slashed but expectations (and pay) stayed the same.
I know I’m a year late responding to this article, but I wasn’t ready then, and I am now. I’ve been pondering the economic impact of significantly shorter work weeks. This kind of thing should be relatively easy to study. First, there needs to be a movement, then the movement’s argument needs to be bolstered by data. This is my new mission, to start a shorter work week movement. It requires a paradigm shift not too different from that required to accept universal health care as a requirement for our society. Of course, Europe is further along in both healthcare and shorter work weeks, but maybe we can use that to get the beginnings of a movement started in the states.
Indeed although I think it will take a movement of the same scale as the industrial revolution for lasting change to occur. It was that movement that blessed us with the current paradigm we live under today which shows you just how dated the idea is. Perhaps we’ll see a big shift in our lifetime, perhaps not but at the very least the ground is fertile for change.